This is a short and crisp article that takes you through some of the most important non functional requirements that an architect should never loose track of. The article shall help you understand each of these non functional requirement from SCEA exam point of view as well.
Non functional requirements also referred to as system level requirements or qualities of a system are one of the most important things that an architect should never loose focus on during inception and elaboration faces of the project. Of-course they come after the functional requirement as even the most robust, scalable and high performance system is useless if it not able to deliver the required behavior and functionality that is expected out of it.
In addition to the functional requirement of the system, it is the responsibility of the architect to work with the stakeholders of the system to define and baseline a quality of service measurement for each of the service level requirements. The architecture must address all the non functional requirements.
Depending upon the system domain and various other factors, an architect might have to make trade-offs between these non-functional requirements. This is perfectly fine, provided the stakeholders are kept informed and involved in decision making in this regard.
Following sections of the article briefly describe most of these non-functional requirements that you should address in your architecture.
The performance requirement is usually measured in terms of response time for a given screen transaction per user. In addition to response time, performance can also be measured in transaction throughput, which is the number of transactions in a given time period, usually one second. For example, you could have a performance measurement that could be no more than three seconds for each screen form or a transaction throughput of one hundred transactions in one second. Regardless of the measurement, you need to create an architecture that allows the designers and developers to complete the system without considering the performance measurement.
Scalability is the ability to support the required quality of service as the system load increases without changing the system. A system can be considered scalable if, as the load increases, the system still responds within the acceptable limits. It might be that you have a performance measurement of a response time between two and five seconds. If the system load increases and the system can maintain the performance quality of service of less than a five second response time, then your system is scalable. To understand scalability, you must first understand the capacity of a system, which is defined as the maximum number of processes or users a system can handle and still maintain the quality of service. If a system is running at capacity and can no longer respond within an acceptable time frame, then it has reached its maximum scalability. To scale a system that has met capacity, you must add additional hardware. This additional hardware can be added vertically or horizontally. Vertical scaling involves adding additional processors, memory, or disks to the current machine(s). Horizontal scaling involves adding more machines to the environment, thus increasing the overall system capacity. The architecture you create must be able to handle the vertical or horizontal scaling of the hardware. Vertical scaling of a software architecture is easier than the horizontal scaling. Why? Adding more processors or memory typically does not have an impact on your architecture, but having your architecture run on multiple machines and still appear to be one system is more
Reliability ensures the integrity and consistency of the application and all its transactions. As the load increases on your system, your system must continue to process requests and handle transactions as accurately as it did before the load increased. Reliability can have a negative impact on scalability. If the system cannot maintain the reliability as the load increases, then the system is really not scalable. So, for a system to truly scale it must be reliable.
Availability ensures that a service/resource is always accessible. Reliability can contribute to availability, but availability can be achieved even if components fail. By setting up an environment of redundant components and failover, an individual component can fail and have a negative impact on reliability, but the service is still available due to the redundancy.
Extensibility is the ability to add additional functionality or modify existing functionality without impacting existing system functionality. You cannot measure extensibility when the system is deployed, but it shows up the first time you must extend the functionality of the system. You should consider the following when you create the architecture and design to help ensure extensibility: low coupling, interfaces, and encapsulation.
Maintainability is the ability to correct flaws in the existing functionality without impacting other components of the system. This is another of those systemic qualities that you cannot measure at the time of deployment. When creating an architecture and design, you should consider the following to enhance the maintainability of a system: low coupling, modularity, and documentation.
Manageability is the ability to manage the system to ensure the continued health of a system with respect to scalability, reliability, availability, performance, and security. Manageability deals with system monitoring of the QoS requirements and the ability to change the system configuration to improve the QoS dynamically without changing the system. Your architecture must have the ability to monitor the system and allow for dynamic system configuration.
Security is the ability to ensure that the system cannot be compromised. Security is by far the most difficult systemic quality to address. Security includes not only issues of confidentiality and integrity, but also relates to Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks that impact availability. Creating an architecture that is separated into functional components makes it easier to secure the system because you can build security zones around the components. If a component is compromised, then it is easier to contain the security violation to that component.